Happy to see it happen if true. Would be a pain to try to find bookings on Airbus flights just to get access to Starlink. Hope it'll be a fast install.
I really struggle to understand your disdain for Delta’s decision to not opt for Starlink. Do you really think, consumers will switch their airlines simply because the wifi onboard is slow or not as fast as competitors? Even when the quality of service is on par, people will be like, nah I am going to book United/AA because they have faster wifi?
I am certain Delta’s reason to not work with Starlink are selfish, but I am happy that (for whatever reason) at least 1 airline isn’t going to give business to a narcissist, xenophobic, racist, egomaniac piece of shit dirtbag.
Yah airlines needs to get starlink installed. It’s a step up function in terms of productivity on the plane. I’m all for competition… I hope this forces blue origin to step it up quickly.
Am I the only one who could give a rats ass about wifi on airplanes?
I will avoid any airline that uses Starlink and if I must fly that airline, I will refuse to connect any device to Starlink
Why are you supporting this?
As a frequent Delta flyer, I actually do hope Delta loses business over the decision not to install Starlink. For a long time, I think Delta has been resting on its reputation, and it’s good for Delta flyers (and obviously flyers of other airlines) to see United and AA making clear improvements. Passengers will come out ahead when there is more and better competition.
On the other hand, I can’t help but feel Ben is getting perhaps a bit too much enjoyment out of trashing Delta over this decision. Delta led United and American for a significant period of time by having free WiFi when United and AA were charging for it — and I don’t seem to recall nearly as much criticism of those airlines back then for lagging Delta (or extensive praise for Delta for offering it).
People boycotting airlines or Starlink over Musk are beyond infantile. Do you boycott all Chinese products due to their human rights violations, or are you only selective when it’s easy? Your boycotts don’t work because nobody cares. I’ll be getting work done using Starlink while you have crappy wi-fi. But hey, you showed Musk, didn’t you?! lol.
Anyone who decides to fly an airline based on whether the carrier utilizes Starlink, or any other internet provider, is not to be taken seriously. This is no different than choosing an airline based upon whether they serve Coke or Pepsi.
My standard for airline loyalty (or even picking which one to fly) is based SOLELY on Price, Performance, Service and Schedule!
A year of Starlink will not produce a significant shift in passengers from Delta to American.
Hope Delta enjoys the WiFi cuck chair the next couple years!
I fly Delta. I would definitely switch for a carrier with better WiFi.
OH FFS. Say it ain't so.
I have been following this discussion with bemusement. Probably much older than most bloggers here. In "my day" (1980's and 90's) we had no wifi, nor the must haves that you all crave, like doors, surly flight attendants, and crappy food. And if you can believe it, no cell phones, until the 90's.
My boss would just remind me to check-in when I reached my destination( but not if he was sleeping).
Somehow we were happy campers, earning our rewards without the stress of 24 hour a day connectivity. We somehow won major contracts, solved customers problems, and still flew worldwide for free with FF miles. And certainly needed no spreadsheets to track our 20 plus credit cards.
Yes, I will carry my laptop, but only to edit my photos in Photoshop, for my blog. If it is a night flight, dinner and sleep.
Why all this stress and anger?
I'm curious if the moves from some major airlines (United, American, etc.) to Starlink will actually improve Viasat's performance (in terms of bandwidth availability, etc.) in the short-term in a way that will help it for airlines like Delta while they wait for Leo.
Starlink still performs better than Viasat ever has for me but if it's 'good enough' for Delta customers until Leo rolls out, it may only impact marginal bookings rather than cause a measurable customer loyalty shift.
Yes I remember the days of phones in seat although because of the cost few used them. Also, back then most people did not particularly want to have several rows of passengers listening into their phone call. Today people will discuss anything out loud with no humility.
Wifi is a nice to have but for me not critical. Most movies today are pathetic. I'd rather read a book or look out the window.
Why does everyone keep celebrating all these airlines' "free" Starlink?
It's free until Elon has another bad drug trip and decides to shut them down on mood or an hallucination telling him to do so, or to start charging the airlines some ungodly sum to use the "free" service once they're all locked in.
And before anyone says "the board won't let him do that!" his boards are no better than potted plants.
The problem is that Delta has always associated itself with premium. Starlink is a premium household name. No one has ever heard of Viasat. So why they would pass up an opportunity to associate themselves with premium is beyond me - it's their whole schtick.
Is the goal of all these posts to somehow shame Delta into reversing course and installing Starlink? The frequency with which I'm reading that Delta is now the black sheep of the aviation world because they won't have Starlink is remarkable. You'd think they chose to fly planes without wings or something.
Is the secret formula to web traffic and engagement just the following:
1) insert airline that thinks/decides/announces a Starlink partnership is best for them
2) shakes fist at sky and yell at the clouds
3) how dare Delta not do the same
4) boom. engagement.
I can't wait for Air Burkina to announce they're installing Starlink on their two E190's tomorrow, and why that means Delta is failing the West African business community.
Until the CEO says something that annoys Elon and it gets shut down. Ask Ukraine how trusting him worked out for them.
