chore: cleaned up misleading comments

[vvysokikh1]

High Level Overview of Change

cleaned up misleading comments left in tests after one of amendment retirements

Context of Change

Type of Change

• Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
• Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
• Refactor (non-breaking change that only restructures code)
• Performance (increase or change in throughput and/or latency)
• Tests (you added tests for code that already exists, or your new feature included in this PR)
• Documentation update
• Chore (no impact to binary, e.g. .gitignore, formatting, dropping support for older tooling)
• Release

API Impact

• Public API: New feature (new methods and/or new fields)
• Public API: Breaking change (in general, breaking changes should only impact the next api_version)
• libxrpl change (any change that may affect libxrpl or dependents of libxrpl)
• Peer protocol change (must be backward compatible or bump the peer protocol version)

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 78.6%. Comparing base (508937f) to head (2f6d79c).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on develop.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           develop   #6031   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage     78.6%   78.6%           
=======================================
  Files          817     817           
  Lines        68985   68985           
  Branches      8239    8235    -4     
=======================================
+ Hits         54204   54212    +8     
+ Misses       14781   14773    -8     

see 3 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[Tapanito]

@vvysokikh1 just to be a little pedantic, how do we know that the comments are missleading?

I.e. I assume you're removing them because that's not what the system does, but how do we know that that's not what the system is supposed to do?

[pratikmankawde]

LGTM. Thanks for removing them.

[vvysokikh1]

@vvysokikh1 just to be a little pedantic, how do we know that the comments are missleading?

I.e. I assume you're removing them because that's not what the system does, but how do we know that that's not what the system is supposed to do?

this test was modified in the previous amendment retirement PR #5946.

These comments describe the pre-amendment behavior and since we retired that they no longer hold any meaning