ci: Use XRPLF/create-issue - #7076
Merged
Merged
Conversation
mathbunnyru
requested review from
Copilot and
godexsoft
and removed request for
Copilot
May 5, 2026 12:00
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop #7076 +/- ##
=========================================
- Coverage 82.1% 82.1% -0.0%
=========================================
Files 1010 1010
Lines 76033 76033
Branches 7379 7368 -11
=========================================
- Hits 62426 62411 -15
- Misses 13607 13622 +15 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
github-merge-queue
Bot
removed this pull request from the merge queue due to failed status checks
May 5, 2026
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
This PR updates the reusable clang-tidy GitHub Actions workflow to use the shared XRPLF/actions/create-issue action for failure issue creation, reducing bespoke shell logic and removing the separate “create-issue-on-failure” job.
Changes:
- Switch clang-tidy failure issue creation from
gh issue create+ artifact handoff toXRPLF/actions/create-issue. - Simplify the generated issue body content and keep only filtered clang-tidy output.
- Add
godexsoftto the cspell allowlist to avoid spellcheck noise for the new assignee configuration.
Reviewed changes
Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated 3 comments.
| File | Description |
|---|---|
cspell.config.yaml |
Adds a GitHub username to the spellchecker allowlist used in CI/config files. |
.github/workflows/reusable-clang-tidy.yml |
Replaces custom issue-creation job/logic with XRPLF/actions/create-issue and adjusts permissions/issue body content. |
💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.
bthomee
enabled auto-merge
May 5, 2026 13:37
oleks-rip
pushed a commit
to oleks-rip/rippled
that referenced
this pull request
May 5, 2026
beartec-jpg
pushed a commit
to beartec-jpg/FalconLedger
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 1, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
High Level Overview of Change
I decided to create a separate create-issue action, because we use it quite a lot.
So, let's use it here.
This simplifies the code, and makes it quite straightforward.
Context of Change
API Impact
libxrplchange (any change that may affectlibxrplor dependents oflibxrpl)