chore: Set clang-format width to 100

[mathbunnyru]

High Level Overview of Change

Context of Change

Type of Change

• Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
• Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
• Refactor (non-breaking change that only restructures code)
• Performance (increase or change in throughput and/or latency)
• Tests (you added tests for code that already exists, or your new feature included in this PR)
• Documentation update
• Chore (no impact to binary, e.g. .gitignore, formatting, dropping support for older tooling)
• Release

API Impact

• Public API: New feature (new methods and/or new fields)
• Public API: Breaking change (in general, breaking changes should only impact the next api_version)
• libxrpl change (any change that may affect libxrpl or dependents of libxrpl)
• Peer protocol change (must be backward compatible or bump the peer protocol version)

[Copilot]

Copilot wasn't able to review this pull request. There are 300 or more changed files, try reducing the number of files in this pull request and requesting a review from Copilot again.

---

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 87.79577% with 294 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 79.8%. Comparing base (469ce9f) to head (2c1fad1).
⚠️ Report is 2 commits behind head on develop.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
src/libxrpl/beast/insight/StatsDCollector.cpp	0.0%	28 Missing ⚠️
src/libxrpl/protocol/XChainAttestations.cpp	38.2%	21 Missing ⚠️
src/libxrpl/shamap/SHAMapSync.cpp	45.5%	18 Missing ⚠️
src/libxrpl/net/HTTPClient.cpp	61.5%	15 Missing ⚠️
include/xrpl/server/detail/BaseHTTPPeer.h	63.9%	13 Missing ⚠️
src/libxrpl/json/json_reader.cpp	50.0%	12 Missing ⚠️
src/libxrpl/nodestore/backend/RocksDBFactory.cpp	26.7%	11 Missing ⚠️
src/libxrpl/shamap/SHAMapDelta.cpp	26.7%	11 Missing ⚠️
include/xrpl/net/HTTPClientSSLContext.h	0.0%	9 Missing ⚠️
include/xrpl/protocol/STValidation.h	33.3%	8 Missing ⚠️
... and 51 more

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##           develop   #6387     +/-   ##
=========================================
- Coverage     80.0%   79.8%   -0.2%     
=========================================
  Files          846     846             
  Lines        65700   67746   +2046     
  Branches      7256    7561    +305     
=========================================
+ Hits         52536   54059   +1523     
- Misses       13164   13687    +523     

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
include/xrpl/basics/DecayingSample.h	88.2% <100.0%> (+0.4%)	⬆️
include/xrpl/basics/Expected.h	100.0% <100.0%> (ø)
include/xrpl/basics/IntrusivePointer.h	91.7% <ø> (ø)
include/xrpl/basics/IntrusiveRefCounts.h	92.7% <100.0%> (+0.2%)	⬆️
include/xrpl/basics/LocalValue.h	100.0% <100.0%> (ø)
include/xrpl/basics/Log.h	71.4% <ø> (ø)
include/xrpl/basics/Number.h	98.7% <100.0%> (+<0.1%)	⬆️
include/xrpl/basics/SharedWeakCachePointer.ipp	75.5% <ø> (ø)
include/xrpl/basics/Slice.h	96.8% <100.0%> (+0.1%)	⬆️
include/xrpl/basics/StringUtilities.h	100.0% <ø> (ø)
... and 263 more

... and 218 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[ximinez]

Could you split this PR into two commits? The first would only change .clang-format, and the second would do the actual formatting. (Include "(#6387)" in both of the commit messages.)

Historically, but inconsistently, we have done it this way to make it easier for others to merge. Basically, a developer would merge up to and including the .clang-format commit only, then format themselves, commit, and merge in the rest. There may still be conflicts, but they're usually greatly reduced. This also removes the need to use -x ours, which can have unpredictable results in some cases.

[Copilot]

Copilot wasn't able to review this pull request. There are 300 or more changed files, try reducing the number of files in this pull request and requesting a review from Copilot again.

---

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

[mathbunnyru]

Could you split this PR into two commits? The first would only change .clang-format, and the second would do the actual formatting. (Include "(#6387)" in both of the commit messages.)

Historically, but inconsistently, we have done it this way to make it easier for others to merge. Basically, a developer would merge up to and including the .clang-format commit only, then format themselves, commit, and merge in the rest. There may still be conflicts, but they're usually greatly reduced. This also removes the need to use -x ours, which can have unpredictable results in some cases.

Done 👍

[ximinez]

Thanks!