ci: Remove @xrplf/rpc-reviewers

[mathbunnyru]

High Level Overview of Change

Context of Change

Type of Change

• Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
• Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
• Refactor (non-breaking change that only restructures code)
• Performance (increase or change in throughput and/or latency)
• Tests (you added tests for code that already exists, or your new feature included in this PR)
• Documentation update
• Chore (no impact to binary, e.g. .gitignore, formatting, dropping support for older tooling)
• Release

API Impact

• Public API: New feature (new methods and/or new fields)
• Public API: Breaking change (in general, breaking changes should only impact the next api_version)
• libxrpl change (any change that may affect libxrpl or dependents of libxrpl)
• Peer protocol change (must be backward compatible or bump the peer protocol version)

[Copilot]

Pull request overview

This PR updates repository review ownership rules by removing the @xrplf/rpc-reviewers team from CODEOWNERS, effectively dropping required-reviewer enforcement for RPC-related paths.

Changes:

• Removed @xrplf/rpc-reviewers ownership rules for RPC/protocol directories in .github/CODEOWNERS.

---

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

[bthomee]

Should we just remove the entire file?

[mathbunnyru]

Should we just remove the entire file?

I think let's keep it - I might want to add myself for the github/tooling related changes in the future, for example, so it might be useful

[mathbunnyru]

Oh, GitHub tells it's incorrect right now (and was incorrect before my change), so let's indeed remove it

[Copilot]

Pull request overview

Copilot reviewed 1 out of 1 changed files in this pull request and generated no new comments.

---

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.