Sponsored Content
Skip to content

Retire fix1571 Amendment - #5925

Merged
bthomee merged 1 commit into
developfrom
pratik/Retire_fix1571_amendment
Oct 29, 2025
Merged

Retire fix1571 Amendment#5925
bthomee merged 1 commit into
developfrom
pratik/Retire_fix1571_amendment

Conversation

@pratikmankawde

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

High Level Overview of Change

This change retires the fix1571 amendment.

Context of Change

Original amendment: https://xrpl.org/resources/known-amendments#fix1571
Amendments activated for more than 2 years can be retired.

Type of Change

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
  • Refactor (non-breaking change that only restructures code)
  • Performance (increase or change in throughput and/or latency)
  • Tests (you added tests for code that already exists, or your new feature included in this PR)
  • Documentation update
  • Chore (no impact to binary, e.g. .gitignore, formatting, dropping support for older tooling)
  • Release

@pratikmankawde
pratikmankawde requested review from a team and ximinez and removed request for a team October 23, 2025 12:02
env(escrow::finish("carol", "alice", seqFt), fee(150 * baseFee));
BEAST_EXPECT(
env.balance("bob") ==
XRP(5200)); // 5100 (from last transaction) + 100

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@ximinez Can you please confirm if this new unit test which checks presence of cancel time and finish time combination is correct?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

considering there's a bunch of tests in this file that have almost same check (search for "Metadata to self" testcase for example), I'd say this seems correct

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for confirming.

@codecov

codecov Bot commented Oct 23, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 78.3%. Comparing base (a8e4da0) to head (898bfa0).
⚠️ Report is 2 commits behind head on develop.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           develop   #5925   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage     78.3%   78.3%           
=======================================
  Files          817     817           
  Lines        68978   68974    -4     
  Branches      8328    8324    -4     
=======================================
- Hits         54010   54009    -1     
+ Misses       14968   14965    -3     
Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
src/xrpld/app/tx/detail/Escrow.cpp 99.2% <100.0%> (-<0.1%) ⬇️

... and 3 files with indirect coverage changes

Impacted file tree graph

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@pratikmankawde
pratikmankawde requested review from a1q123456 and vvysokikh1 and removed request for ximinez October 24, 2025 15:11

@vvysokikh1 vvysokikh1 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

env(escrow::finish("carol", "alice", seqFt), fee(150 * baseFee));
BEAST_EXPECT(
env.balance("bob") ==
XRP(5200)); // 5100 (from last transaction) + 100

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

considering there's a bunch of tests in this file that have almost same check (search for "Metadata to self" testcase for example), I'd say this seems correct

@a1q123456 a1q123456 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@pratikmankawde pratikmankawde added the Ready to merge *PR author* thinks it's ready to merge. Has passed code review. Perf sign-off may still be required. label Oct 29, 2025
Amendments activated for more than 2 years can be retired. This change retires the fix1571 amendment.
@bthomee
bthomee force-pushed the pratik/Retire_fix1571_amendment branch from 0128477 to 898bfa0 Compare October 29, 2025 13:40
@bthomee
bthomee added this pull request to the merge queue Oct 29, 2025
@bthomee
bthomee removed this pull request from the merge queue due to a manual request Oct 29, 2025
@bthomee
bthomee added this pull request to the merge queue Oct 29, 2025
Merged via the queue into develop with commit bd3bc91 Oct 29, 2025
3 checks passed
@bthomee
bthomee deleted the pratik/Retire_fix1571_amendment branch October 29, 2025 15:00
@mvadari mvadari added this to the 3.2.0 milestone May 20, 2026
beartec-jpg pushed a commit to beartec-jpg/FalconLedger that referenced this pull request Jun 1, 2026
Amendments activated for more than 2 years can be retired. This change retires the fix1571 amendment.

Co-authored-by: Bart Thomee <11445373+bthomee@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Ready to merge *PR author* thinks it's ready to merge. Has passed code review. Perf sign-off may still be required.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants